Redmi K90 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

The Redmi K90 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $561 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads — 86/100 vs 73/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4800); the Redmi K90 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,897,821 vs 3,382,020); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is thinner (4.5mm vs 7.9mm).

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi K90 Pro Max

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 89
Portability 54
Value for money 90

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

Performance 96
Display 80
Camera 50
Battery 52
Portability 74
Value for money 54

What makes Redmi K90 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3897821 vs 3382020
  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $561 vs $1999

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 96/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 50/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 better?

  • Lighter: 201g vs 210g

  • Better portability (74/100 vs 54/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K90 Pro Max vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, the Redmi K90 Pro Max scores 13 points higher (86/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Redmi K90 Pro Max — 90/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 54/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are nearly equal (98/100 vs 96/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (89/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (74/100 vs 54/100).

Redmi K90 Pro Max: The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi K90 Pro Max Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3897821 3382020
Geekbench Single 3639 3639
Geekbench Multi 11047 11047
Display 6.9" OLED 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2608x1200 1828x2448
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7560 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 17 / One UI 9
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm 123.9×161.4×4.5 mm
Weight 210 g 201 g
Launch price $561 $1999

Camera comparison

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera

Display comparison

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • 6.9" OLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1828x2448
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100
3897821 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
73/100 -15.3%
3382020 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Pro Max leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 by 15.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi K90 Pro Max

$561

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8

$1999

Launch price difference: $1438. Redmi K90 Pro Max was $1438 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are nearly equal (98/100 vs 96/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (78/100 vs 50/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 (89/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (74/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on camera score (78/100 vs 50/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Pro Max over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.