Redmi K80 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A30

The Redmi K80 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A30 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7904; estimated prices are $511 and $220. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 12/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 16 MP; the Redmi K80 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,660 vs 241,600); the Redmi K80 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A30 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A30 is noticeably lighter (165g vs 215g).

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 by 59 points (71/100 vs 12/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K80 Pro
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 63
Battery 79
Design 31
Value for money 75
Samsung Galaxy A30
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 5
Battery 12
Design 93
Value for money 95
What makes Redmi K80 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014660 vs 241600
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 330
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 975
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (63/100 vs 5/100)
  • Longer battery life (79/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A30 better?
  • Lighter: 165g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $220 vs $511

  • Better design/ergonomics (93/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (95/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K80 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A30, the Redmi K80 Pro scores 59 points higher (71/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (63/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (79/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A30 leads (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (63/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (79/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A30 significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (93/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A30 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (95/100 vs 75/100).

Redmi K80 Pro: The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A30: The Samsung Galaxy A30 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi K80 Pro Samsung Galaxy A30
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 7904
AnTuTu 3014660 241600
Geekbench Single 3050 330
Geekbench Multi 9300 975
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.4" AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 120W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 16 MP
Ultrawide 32 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 20 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 3GB / 4GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 32GB / 64GB
OS Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68
Dimensions 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm 158.5×74.7×7.7 mm
Weight 215 g 165 g
Price $511 $220
Camera comparison
Redmi K80 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
63
camera
Samsung Galaxy A30
  • Main: 16MP
  • Front: 16MP
5
camera
Display comparison
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy A30
  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Battery and charging
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
79
battery
Samsung Galaxy A30
  • 4000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
12
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K80 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100
3014660 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A30 Samsung Exynos 7904
12/100 -1147.8%
241600 AnTuTu

Redmi K80 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A30 by 1147.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi K80 Pro
$511
Samsung Galaxy A30
$220

Price difference: $291. Samsung Galaxy A30 is cheaper by $291.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (68/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (63/100 vs 5/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 (79/100 vs 12/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A30 significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (93/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A30 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (95/100 vs 75/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A30?

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A30 by 59 points (71/100 vs 12/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K80 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A30?

The Redmi K80 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy A30 — 12/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A30?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 5/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A30?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on performance (68/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K80 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A30?

The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A30 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.