Redmi K80 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A37

The Redmi K80 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A37 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1480; estimated prices are $511 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 29/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi K80 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,660 vs 1,031,048); the Samsung Galaxy A37 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 215g).

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 by 42 points (71/100 vs 29/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K80 Pro
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 63
Battery 79
Design 31
Value for money 75
Samsung Galaxy A37
Performance 7
Display 50
Camera 26
Battery 37
Design 75
Value for money 93
What makes Redmi K80 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014660 vs 1031048
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1140
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 3346
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 7/100)
  • Better camera (63/100 vs 26/100)
  • Longer battery life (79/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A37 better?
  • Lighter: 180g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $250 vs $511

  • Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (93/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K80 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A37, the Redmi K80 Pro scores 42 points higher (71/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (68/100 vs 7/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (63/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (79/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 leads (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (68/100 vs 7/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (63/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (79/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (75/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (93/100 vs 75/100).

Redmi K80 Pro: The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A37: The Samsung Galaxy A37 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi K80 Pro Samsung Galaxy A37
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 1480
AnTuTu 3014660 1031048
Geekbench Single 3050 1140
Geekbench Multi 9300 3346
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.5" Super AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440 2340x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 120W 25W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 32 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 20 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 6GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 1900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm 162.9×78.2×7.4 mm
Weight 215 g 180 g
Price $511 $250
Camera comparison
Redmi K80 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
63
camera
Samsung Galaxy A37
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
26
camera
Display comparison
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy A37
  • 6.5" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
79
battery
Samsung Galaxy A37
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K80 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A37, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100
3014660 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A37 Samsung Exynos 1480
29/100 -192.4%
1031048 AnTuTu

Redmi K80 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A37 by 192.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi K80 Pro
$511
Samsung Galaxy A37
$250

Price difference: $261. Samsung Galaxy A37 is cheaper by $261.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (68/100 vs 7/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (63/100 vs 26/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (79/100 vs 37/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (75/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (93/100 vs 75/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A37?

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 by 42 points (71/100 vs 29/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K80 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A37?

The Redmi K80 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy A37 — 29/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A37?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 26/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A37?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on performance (68/100 vs 7/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K80 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A37?

The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A37 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.