Redmi K50 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Redmi K50 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $472 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 65/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 1,504,467); the Redmi K50 Pro is noticeably lighter (201g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K50 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Redmi K50 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 201g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $472 vs $548
- Better camera (46/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 1504467
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1693
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4384
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 90/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi K50 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 10 points higher (75/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K50 Pro leads (46/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Redmi K50 Pro — 54/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi K50 Pro (95/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K50 Pro is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi K50 Pro (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi K50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (53/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi K50 Pro | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 1504467 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1693 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4384 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.2×8.5 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $472 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Redmi K50 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Redmi K50 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi K50 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi K50 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Redmi K50 Pro by 58.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $76. Redmi K50 Pro was $76 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi K50 Pro (95/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K50 Pro is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi K50 Pro (80/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi K50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (53/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Redmi K50 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi K50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Redmi K50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi K50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Redmi K50 Pro leads on camera score (46/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi K50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Redmi K50 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Redmi K50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.