Redmi A7 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

The Redmi A7 Pro 5G (2026) runs on the Unisoc T8300, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $110 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 42/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi A7 Pro 5G has the bigger battery (6300 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 32 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 639,225); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi A7 Pro 5G doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.2mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G by 33 points (75/100 vs 42/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi A7 Pro 5G

Performance 47
Display 55
Camera 20
Battery 52
Portability 51
Value for money 68

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

What makes Redmi A7 Pro 5G better?

  • Bigger battery: 6300 vs 4400 mAh
  • Lighter: 210g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $110 vs $1999

  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 639225
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 880
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 2073
  • Faster charging: 25W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 32MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 20/100)
  • Better display (78/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi A7 Pro 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 33 points higher (75/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi A7 Pro 5G leads (52/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Redmi A7 Pro 5G — 68/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G (78/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G (76/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi A7 Pro 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G (66/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi A7 Pro 5G Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Processor Unisoc T8300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 639225 3065623
Geekbench Single 880 2910
Geekbench Multi 2073 9174
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1600 2184x1968
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6300 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 15W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 145
Main camera 32 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 8 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP48
Dimensions 171.5×79.5×8.2 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 210 g 215 g
Launch price $110 $1999

Camera comparison

Redmi A7 Pro 5G

  • Main: 32MP f/2.0
  • Front: 8MP
20
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Display comparison

Redmi A7 Pro 5G

  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Redmi A7 Pro 5G

  • 6300 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi A7 Pro 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi A7 Pro 5G Unisoc T8300
42/100
639225 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100 +79.1%
3065623 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Redmi A7 Pro 5G by 79.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi A7 Pro 5G

$110

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Launch price difference: $1889. Redmi A7 Pro 5G was $1889 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G (91/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G (78/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G (76/100 vs 20/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi A7 Pro 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G (66/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi A7 Pro 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Redmi A7 Pro 5G by 33 points (75/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi A7 Pro 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Redmi A7 Pro 5G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi A7 Pro 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 20/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi A7 Pro 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Redmi A7 Pro 5G over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.