Redmi A5 4G vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Redmi A5 4G (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7250, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 35/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 32 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi A5 4G doesn't.
Redmi A5 4G
Vivo X300 Pro
- Overall rating 35/100
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 600
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1800
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 32MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 32/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Redmi A5 4G vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 52 points higher (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (93/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (81/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Redmi A5 4G | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7250 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 600 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1800 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 32 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Redmi A5 4G
- Main: 32MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi A5 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi A5 4G
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Redmi A5 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (93/100 vs 32/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (84/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (96/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (81/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Redmi A5 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G by 52 points (87/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi A5 4G and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi A5 4G has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi A5 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi A5 4G or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Redmi A5 4G over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi A5 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.