Redmi A5 4G vs Vivo X Fold6
The Redmi A5 4G (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7250, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 35/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 32 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi A5 4G doesn't.
Redmi A5 4G
Vivo X Fold6
- Overall rating 35/100
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 600
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1800
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 32MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 32/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Redmi A5 4G vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 53 points higher (88/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (87/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (82/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Redmi A5 4G | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7250 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3485039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 600 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1800 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 32 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Launch price | — | $1900 |
Redmi A5 4G
- Main: 32MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Redmi A5 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi A5 4G
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Redmi A5 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (94/100 vs 32/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (81/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (87/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (82/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Redmi A5 4G or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G by 53 points (88/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi A5 4G and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Redmi A5 4G has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi A5 4G or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi A5 4G or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Redmi A5 4G over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Redmi A5 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.