Redmi A5 4G vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier
The Redmi A5 4G (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7250, while the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads — 73/100 vs 35/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi A5 4G has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 32 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Camon 40 Premier has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi A5 4G doesn't.
Redmi A5 4G
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5100 mAh
- Overall rating 35/100
- Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 600
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 1800
- Faster charging: 70W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 32MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (70/100 vs 32/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Redmi A5 4G vs the Tecno Camon 40 Premier, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier scores 38 points higher (73/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (70/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (70/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (81/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Redmi A5 4G | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7250 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1724757 | |
| Geekbench Single | 600 | 1398 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1800 | 4313 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 70W | |
| Main camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Redmi A5 4G
- Main: 32MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi A5 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Redmi A5 4G
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (70/100 vs 32/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (94/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G (81/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Redmi A5 4G or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Redmi A5 4G by 38 points (73/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi A5 4G and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Redmi A5 4G has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi A5 4G or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi A5 4G or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on performance (70/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Redmi A5 4G over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Redmi A5 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.