Redmi 4A vs Samsung Galaxy M17

The Redmi 4A (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $100 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads — 26/100 vs 10/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3120); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M17 is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 180,934); the Samsung Galaxy M17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 4A doesn't; the Redmi 4A is noticeably lighter (131g vs 192g).

The Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably better than the Redmi 4A — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi 4A
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 0
Design 100
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy M17
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 28
Battery 37
Design 60
Value for money 100
What makes Redmi 4A better?
  • Lighter: 131g vs 192g
  • Cheaper: $100 vs $130

  • Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 60/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 180934
  • Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 130
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1963 vs 488
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3120 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz

  • Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (37/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 4A vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Samsung Galaxy M17 scores 16 points higher (26/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi 4A (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

Redmi 4A: The Redmi 4A is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy M17: The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi 4A Samsung Galaxy M17
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 180934 607137
Geekbench Single 130 952
Geekbench Multi 488 1963
Display 5.0" IPS LCD 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340
Refresh rate 60 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 3120 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 25W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 5 MP
Front camera 5 MP 13 MP
RAM 2GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 128GB
OS Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1100 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP54
Dimensions 139.9×70.4×8.5 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 131 g 192 g
Price $100 $130
Camera comparison
Redmi 4A
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
28
camera
Display comparison
Redmi 4A
  • 5.0" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Redmi 4A
  • 3120 mAh
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 4A and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 4A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
10/100
180934 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy M17 Samsung Exynos 1330
26/100 +70.2%
607137 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy M17 leads Redmi 4A by 70.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi 4A
$100
Samsung Galaxy M17
$130

Price difference: $30. Redmi 4A is cheaper by $30.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (50/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi 4A (28/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (37/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 60/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi 4A or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably better than the Redmi 4A — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi 4A and the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi 4A has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 26/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 4A or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Samsung Galaxy M17 leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 4A over the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi 4A is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.