Redmi 4A vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

The Redmi 4A (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $100 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 17/100 (a 63-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3120); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 180,934); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 4A doesn't; the Redmi 4A is noticeably lighter (131g vs 218g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A by 63 points (80/100 vs 17/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi 4A

Performance 10
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 78
Value for money 22

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Performance 92
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 70

What makes Redmi 4A better?

  • Lighter: 131g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $1299

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 46/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 180934
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 130
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 488
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3120 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 4A vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 63 points higher (80/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (56/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Redmi 4A — 22/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (92/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (88/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (81/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (56/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (78/100 vs 46/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi 4A Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 180934 3128552
Geekbench Single 130 3100
Geekbench Multi 488 9760
Display 5.0" IPS LCD 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution — 3120x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3120 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging — 45W
Wireless charging — 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 151
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 12 MP
RAM 2GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS — Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) — 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 139.9×70.4×8.5 mm 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm
Weight 131 g 218 g
Launch price $100 $1299

Camera comparison

Redmi 4A

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Redmi 4A

  • 5.0" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

Redmi 4A

  • 3120 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 4A and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 4A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
17/100
180934 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
80/100 +94.2%
3128552 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Redmi 4A by 94.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi 4A

$100

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

$1299

Launch price difference: $1199. Redmi 4A was $1199 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (92/100 vs 10/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (88/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (81/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A (56/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi 4A significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (78/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi 4A or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 4A by 63 points (80/100 vs 17/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi 4A and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Redmi 4A has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 80/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 4A or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi 4A or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 10/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 4A over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.