Redmi 3S vs Samsung Galaxy M17

The Redmi 3S (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $120 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads — 26/100 vs 12/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy M17 is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 180,440); the Samsung Galaxy M17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 3S doesn't; the Redmi 3S is noticeably lighter (144g vs 192g).

The Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably better than the Redmi 3S — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi 3S
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 14
Design 100
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy M17
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 28
Battery 37
Design 60
Value for money 100
What makes Redmi 3S better?
  • Lighter: 144g vs 192g
  • Cheaper: $120 vs $130

  • Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 60/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 180440
  • Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1963 vs 827
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4100 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz

  • Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (37/100 vs 14/100)
  • Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 3S vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Samsung Galaxy M17 scores 14 points higher (26/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (37/100 vs 14/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (37/100 vs 14/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 3S significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

Redmi 3S: The Redmi 3S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy M17: The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi 3S Samsung Galaxy M17
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 180440 607137
Geekbench Single 205 952
Geekbench Multi 827 1963
Display 5.0" IPS LCD 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340
Refresh rate 60 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 4100 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 25W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 5 MP
Front camera 5 MP 13 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 128GB
OS Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1100 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP54
Dimensions 139.3×69.6×8.5 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 144 g 192 g
Price $120 $130
Camera comparison
Redmi 3S
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
28
camera
Display comparison
Redmi 3S
  • 5.0" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Redmi 3S
  • 4100 mAh
  • No wireless charging
14
battery
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 3S and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 3S Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
12/100
180440 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy M17 Samsung Exynos 1330
26/100 +70.3%
607137 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy M17 leads Redmi 3S by 70.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi 3S
$120
Samsung Galaxy M17
$130

Price difference: $10. Redmi 3S is cheaper by $10.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (50/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (28/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (37/100 vs 14/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi 3S significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 60/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi 3S or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably better than the Redmi 3S — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi 3S and the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi 3S has a MobileRank rating of 12/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 26/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 3S or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Samsung Galaxy M17 leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 3S over the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi 3S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.