Redmi K80 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M17

The Redmi K80 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $511 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 26/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi K80 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,660 vs 607,137); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 215g).

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 45 points (71/100 vs 26/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K80 Pro
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 63
Battery 79
Design 31
Value for money 75
Samsung Galaxy M17
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 28
Battery 37
Design 60
Value for money 100
What makes Redmi K80 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014660 vs 607137
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 952
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1963
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (63/100 vs 28/100)
  • Longer battery life (79/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?
  • Lighter: 192g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $130 vs $511

  • Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K80 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Redmi K80 Pro scores 45 points higher (71/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (63/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (79/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (63/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (79/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (60/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (100/100 vs 75/100).

Redmi K80 Pro: The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy M17: The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi K80 Pro Samsung Galaxy M17
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 3014660 607137
Geekbench Single 3050 952
Geekbench Multi 9300 1963
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 120W 25W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 32 MP 5 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 20 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 1100 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP54
Dimensions 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 215 g 192 g
Price $511 $130
Camera comparison
Redmi K80 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
63
camera
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
28
camera
Display comparison
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
79
battery
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K80 Pro and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100
3014660 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy M17 Samsung Exynos 1330
26/100 -396.5%
607137 AnTuTu

Redmi K80 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 396.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi K80 Pro
$511
Samsung Galaxy M17
$130

Price difference: $381. Samsung Galaxy M17 is cheaper by $381.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (68/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (63/100 vs 28/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (79/100 vs 37/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (60/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (100/100 vs 75/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 45 points (71/100 vs 26/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K80 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi K80 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 26/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 28/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on performance (68/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K80 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy M17?

The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.