Redmi 13C 4G vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Redmi 13C 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 39/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 554,590); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 13C 4G doesn't.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G by 32 points (71/100 vs 39/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi 13C 4G

Performance 43
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability —
Value for money —

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Redmi 13C 4G better?


  • Overall rating 39/100

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 554590
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 2047
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 44/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 13C 4G vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 32 points higher (71/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (68/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi 13C 4G ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 554590 1294871
Geekbench Single 727 1662
Geekbench Multi 2047 4188
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1650 1116x2480
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 10W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 5 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, MIUI 14 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 1500 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions — 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight — 204 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Redmi 13C 4G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 5MP
30
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Redmi 13C 4G

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1650
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Redmi 13C 4G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 13C 4G and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 13C 4G MediaTek Helio G99
39/100
554590 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +57.2%
1294871 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Redmi 13C 4G by 57.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (68/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (80/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (86/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi 13C 4G or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G by 32 points (71/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi 13C 4G and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Redmi 13C 4G has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 13C 4G or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi 13C 4G or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 13C 4G over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.