Redmi 13C 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The Redmi 13C 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads — 48/100 vs 39/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17 is faster in AnTuTu (607,489 vs 554,590); the Samsung Galaxy M17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 13C 4G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi 13C 4G
Samsung Galaxy M17
What makes Redmi 13C 4G better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2047 vs 1826
- Overall rating 39/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 607489 vs 554590
- Better Geekbench Single: 960 vs 727
- Faster charging: 25W vs 10W
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (67/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi 13C 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Samsung Galaxy M17 scores 9 points higher (48/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (67/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi 13C 4G | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 554590 | 607489 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 960 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 1826 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 14 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $130 |
Camera comparison
Redmi 13C 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Redmi 13C 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi 13C 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi 13C 4G and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M17 leads Redmi 13C 4G by 8.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi 13C 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (67/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi 13C 4G or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 edges out the Redmi 13C 4G by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi 13C 4G and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Redmi 13C 4G has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 48/100.
Should you choose the Redmi 13C 4G over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.