Realme Narzo 20A vs Vivo Y32t
The Realme Narzo 20A (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 27/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 12 MP vs 13 MP; the Realme Narzo 20A is faster in AnTuTu (329,457 vs 303,398); the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 195g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme Narzo 20A
Vivo Y32t
What makes Realme Narzo 20A better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 329457 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1128 vs 779
- Higher performance (24/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 321
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 12MP
- Lighter: 179g vs 195g
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Realme Narzo 20A vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 1 points higher (28/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme Narzo 20A and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 20A (68/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Realme Narzo 20A | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10, Realme UI | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×75.4×8.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Realme Narzo 20A
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Realme Narzo 20A
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Realme Narzo 20A
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Realme Narzo 20A and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme Narzo 20A leads Vivo Y32t by 8.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Realme Narzo 20A and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (24/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 20A (68/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme Narzo 20A or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Realme Narzo 20A by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme Narzo 20A and the Vivo Y32t?
The Realme Narzo 20A has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Should you choose the Realme Narzo 20A over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 52/100).