Realme Narzo 100x vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Realme Narzo 100x (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y300 (China) leads — 48/100 vs 46/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo 100x has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6500); the Vivo Y300 (China) is noticeably lighter (200g vs 224g).
Realme Narzo 100x
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 58/100)
- Lighter: 200g vs 224g
- Better display (79/100 vs 65/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Realme Narzo 100x vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Vivo Y300 (China) scores 2 points higher (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (79/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 100x is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 100x (61/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Realme Narzo 100x | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1570 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×78.2×8.8 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 224 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $205 | — |
Realme Narzo 100x
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Realme Narzo 100x
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1570
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme Narzo 100x
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Realme Narzo 100x and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (79/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 100x is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 100x (61/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Realme Narzo 100x or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Vivo Y300 (China) edges out the Realme Narzo 100x by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme Narzo 100x and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Realme Narzo 100x has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.
Should you choose the Realme Narzo 100x over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Realme Narzo 100x is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.