Realme GT5 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Realme GT5 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $500 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 77/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,402,979); the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.2mm).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Realme GT5 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Realme GT5 Pro

Performance 82
Display 94
Camera 67
Battery 80
Portability 35
Value for money 76

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Realme GT5 Pro better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 218g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $950

  • Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2402979
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5400 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme GT5 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 14 points higher (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 67/100). Value score: Realme GT5 Pro — 76/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme GT5 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT5 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme GT5 Pro (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Realme GT5 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).

Realme GT5 Pro: The Realme GT5 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Realme GT5 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2402979 4247433
Geekbench Single 2203 3639
Geekbench Multi 6511 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2780x1264 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5400 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 161.7×75.1×9.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 218 g 230 g
Launch price $500 $950

Camera comparison

Realme GT5 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 32MP
67
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Realme GT5 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Realme GT5 Pro

  • 5400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Realme GT5 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme GT5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
77/100
2402979 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +43.4%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Realme GT5 Pro by 43.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Realme GT5 Pro

$500

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $450. Realme GT5 Pro was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme GT5 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Realme GT5 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme GT5 Pro (96/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Realme GT5 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Realme GT5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Realme GT5 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Realme GT5 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Realme GT5 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme GT5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme GT5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).

Should you choose the Realme GT5 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Realme GT5 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.