Realme GT 2 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8
The Realme GT 2 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1, while the Tecno Pova 8 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads — 37/100 vs 35/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 8 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the Realme GT 2 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 220g).
Realme GT 2 Pro
Tecno Pova 8
- Faster charging: 65W vs 45W
- Lighter: 199g vs 220g
- Better camera (54/100 vs 29/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 25/100)
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 47/100)
- Better value for money (90/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Realme GT 2 Pro vs the Tecno Pova 8, the Realme GT 2 Pro scores 2 points higher (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads (54/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 8 leads (60/100 vs 47/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 8 leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 8 and the Realme GT 2 Pro are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 8 (54/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 8 is a bit better (60/100 vs 47/100). In the "design" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 8 (51/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 8 significantly outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (90/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Realme GT 2 Pro | Tecno Pova 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 835566 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 995 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2925 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2460x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Weight | 199 g | 220 g | |
| Price | — | $295 |
Realme GT 2 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova 8
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 8
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2460x1080
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 8
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT 2 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 8 and the Realme GT 2 Pro are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 8 (54/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 8 is a bit better (60/100 vs 47/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 8 (51/100 vs 25/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 8 significantly outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (90/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT 2 Pro or the Tecno Pova 8?
The Realme GT 2 Pro edges out the Tecno Pova 8 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme GT 2 Pro and the Tecno Pova 8?
The Realme GT 2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Tecno Pova 8 — 35/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT 2 Pro or the Tecno Pova 8?
The Realme GT 2 Pro leads on camera score (54/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT 2 Pro over the Tecno Pova 8?
The Realme GT 2 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova 8 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.