Realme GT 2 Pro vs Tecno Pova 7 Neo
The Realme GT 2 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1, while the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads — 37/100 vs 30/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Neo has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP.
Realme GT 2 Pro
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- Faster charging: 65W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 210g
- Better camera (54/100 vs 35/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 47/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Realme GT 2 Pro vs the Tecno Pova 7 Neo, the Realme GT 2 Pro scores 7 points higher (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads (54/100 vs 35/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (54/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo is a bit better (56/100 vs 47/100). In the "design" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo significantly outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Realme GT 2 Pro | Tecno Pova 7 Neo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | — | 560883 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | Android 14 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 210 g | |
| Price | — | $140 |
Realme GT 2 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT 2 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (54/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo is a bit better (56/100 vs 47/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo significantly outperforms the Realme GT 2 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Realme GT 2 Pro or the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Realme GT 2 Pro edges out the Tecno Pova 7 Neo by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme GT 2 Pro and the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Realme GT 2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme GT 2 Pro or the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Realme GT 2 Pro leads on camera score (54/100 vs 35/100).
Should you choose the Realme GT 2 Pro over the Tecno Pova 7 Neo?
The Realme GT 2 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova 7 Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.