Realme C71 vs Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
The Realme C71 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7250, while the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $146 and $179. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme C71 leads — 33/100 vs 26/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 310,000); the Realme C71 is thinner (7.8mm vs 9.4mm).
Realme C71
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 196g vs 206g
- Cheaper: $146 vs $179
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (55/100 vs 42/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 98/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 310000
- Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 600
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1963 vs 1800
- Better camera (26/100 vs 24/100)
Comparing the Realme C71 vs the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G, the Realme C71 scores 7 points higher (33/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Realme C71 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Realme C71 are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C71 is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Realme C71 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C71 and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G are nearly equal (100/100 vs 98/100).
| Specification | Realme C71 | Samsung Galaxy M14 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7250 | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 310000 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 600 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1800 | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1604 | 2408x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 725 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 165.8×75.9×7.8 mm | 166.8×77.2×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 206 g | |
| Price | $146 | $179 |
Realme C71
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Realme C71
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme C71
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
We compared Realme C71 and Samsung Galaxy M14 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G leads Realme C71 by 48.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $33. Realme C71 is cheaper by $33.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Realme C71 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G and the Realme C71 are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C71 is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme C71 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme C71 and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G are nearly equal (100/100 vs 98/100).
Which is better: the Realme C71 or the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G?
The Realme C71 edges out the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme C71 and the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G?
The Realme C71 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G — 26/100.
Should you choose the Realme C71 over the Samsung Galaxy M14 5G?
The Realme C71 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.