Motorola Moto G35 vs Realme C71
The Motorola Moto G35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760, while the Realme C71 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7250; estimated prices are $187 and $146. Both devices score the same overall rating of 33/100. Key differences: the Realme C71 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Moto G35 is faster in AnTuTu (628,581 vs 310,000).
Motorola Moto G35
Realme C71
- Higher AnTuTu: 628581 vs 310000
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 600
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2186 vs 1800
- Lighter: 188g vs 196g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Cheaper: $146 vs $187
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 97/100)
The Motorola Moto G35 and the Realme C71 received the same MobileRank rating — 33/100. In the "battery" category, the Realme C71 leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (31/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C71 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C71 and the Motorola Moto G35 are nearly equal (100/100 vs 97/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G35 | Realme C71 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | Unisoc T7250 | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | 310000 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 600 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2186 | 1800 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1604 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 725 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.3×76.0×7.8 mm | 165.8×75.9×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 196 g | |
| Price | $187 | $146 |
Motorola Moto G35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Realme C71
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Moto G35
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme C71
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Realme C71
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Moto G35 and Realme C71, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Moto G35 leads Realme C71 by 102.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $41. Realme C71 is cheaper by $41.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (31/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C71 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G35 (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G35 is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme C71 and the Motorola Moto G35 are nearly equal (100/100 vs 97/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G35 or the Realme C71?
Both devices scored 33/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Realme C71.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G35 and the Realme C71?
The Motorola Moto G35 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Realme C71 — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G35 or the Realme C71?
The Motorola Moto G35 leads on camera score (31/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G35 over the Realme C71?
The Motorola Moto G35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Realme C71 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.