Realme C65 4G vs ZTE Blade V80 Design
The Realme C65 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the ZTE Blade V80 Design (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7280. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade V80 Design leads — 29/100 vs 27/100 (a 2-point difference).
Realme C65 4G
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- Faster charging: 45W vs 5W
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Realme C65 4G vs the ZTE Blade V80 Design, the ZTE Blade V80 Design scores 2 points higher (29/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design significantly outperforms the Realme C65 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design and the Realme C65 4G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (68/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Realme C65 4G | ZTE Blade V80 Design | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Unisoc T7280 | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 420 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1364 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1604 | 900x1940 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 625 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×76.1×7.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 185 g | — | |
| Price | $125 | — |
Realme C65 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Realme C65 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 900x1940
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme C65 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V80 Design
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design significantly outperforms the Realme C65 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design and the Realme C65 4G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G notably outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (68/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme C65 4G significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Realme C65 4G or the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The ZTE Blade V80 Design edges out the Realme C65 4G by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme C65 4G and the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The Realme C65 4G has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the ZTE Blade V80 Design — 29/100.
Should you choose the Realme C65 4G over the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The Realme C65 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade V80 Design is a better fit for everyday use.