Samsung Galaxy M17 vs ZTE Blade V80 Design
The Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the ZTE Blade V80 Design (2025) runs on the Unisoc T7280. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade V80 Design leads — 29/100 vs 26/100 (a 3-point difference).
Samsung Galaxy M17
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- Faster charging: 25W vs 5W
- Better camera (28/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17 vs the ZTE Blade V80 Design, the ZTE Blade V80 Design scores 3 points higher (29/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design are nearly equal (28/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17 | ZTE Blade V80 Design | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Unisoc T7280 | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 900x1940 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 192 g | — | |
| Price | $130 | — |
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 900x1940
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V80 Design
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V80 Design
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade V80 Design significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design are nearly equal (28/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 is a bit better (60/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V80 Design (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The ZTE Blade V80 Design edges out the Samsung Galaxy M17 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the ZTE Blade V80 Design — 29/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17 over the ZTE Blade V80 Design?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade V80 Design is a better fit for everyday use.