Realme C65 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M17
The Realme C65 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $125 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme C65 4G leads — 27/100 vs 26/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17 is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 346,495).
Realme C65 4G
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Lighter: 185g vs 192g
- Cheaper: $125 vs $130
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 37/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 60/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 420
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1963 vs 1364
- Better camera (28/100 vs 24/100)
Comparing the Realme C65 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy M17, the Realme C65 4G scores 1 points higher (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Realme C65 4G are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (42/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Realme C65 4G | Samsung Galaxy M17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 420 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1364 | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1604 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 625 nits | 1100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×76.1×7.6 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 192 g | |
| Price | $125 | $130 |
Realme C65 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Realme C65 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme C65 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Realme C65 4G and Samsung Galaxy M17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M17 leads Realme C65 4G by 42.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $5. Realme C65 4G is cheaper by $5.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Realme C65 4G are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (42/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Realme C65 4G or the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Realme C65 4G edges out the Samsung Galaxy M17 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme C65 4G and the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Realme C65 4G has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Realme C65 4G over the Samsung Galaxy M17?
The Realme C65 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.