Realme C61 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Realme C61 (2024) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T612, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 90/100 vs 30/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme C61 doesn't; the Realme C61 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 219g).
Realme C61
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Lighter: 188g vs 219g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 48/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 360
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1250
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 2160Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (89/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Realme C61 vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 60 points higher (90/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (98/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme C61 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (68/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Realme C61 | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T612 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | 360 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1250 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 2160 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 159 | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 560 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.3×76.7×7.8 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Realme C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Realme C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 2160 Hz
Realme C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Realme C61
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (98/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (91/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (89/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme C61 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (68/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Realme C61 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Realme C61 by 60 points (90/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Realme C61 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Realme C61 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 90/100.
Which is more powerful: the Realme C61 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Realme C61 over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Realme C61 is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.