Realme 16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Realme 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $499 and $10498. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 62/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 919,158); the Realme 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (197g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16 Pro by 29 points (91/100 vs 62/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme 16 Pro
Performance 55
Display 93
Camera 53
Battery 68
Portability 62
Value for money 50
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 86
What makes Realme 16 Pro better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 197g vs 230g
  • Cheaper: $499 vs $10498

  • Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (62/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 919158
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 53/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 29 points higher (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Realme 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16 Pro (96/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme 16 Pro (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16 Pro (86/100 vs 50/100).

Realme 16 Pro: The Realme 16 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Realme 16 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 919158 4247433
Geekbench Single 1011 3640
Geekbench Multi 2813 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2700x1224 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.6×77.6×7.8 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 197 g 230 g
Price $499 $10498
Camera comparison
Realme 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
53
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Realme 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2700x1224
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
93
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Realme 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Realme 16 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max
62/100
919158 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +78.4%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Realme 16 Pro by 78.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Realme 16 Pro
$499
Vivo X300 Ultra
$10498

Price difference: $9999. Realme 16 Pro is cheaper by $9999.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Realme 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16 Pro (96/100 vs 53/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme 16 Pro (85/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Realme 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (62/100 vs 39/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16 Pro (86/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 16 Pro by 29 points (91/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Realme 16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Realme 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 53/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme 16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Realme 16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Realme 16 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.