Poco M5 (India) vs Samsung Galaxy A15

The Poco M5 (India) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy A15 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A15 leads — 48/100 vs 41/100 (a 7-point difference).

The Samsung Galaxy A15 edges out the Poco M5 (India) by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco M5 (India)

Performance 43
Display 54
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 49
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy A15

Performance 43
Display 68
Camera 31
Battery 66
Portability 60
Value for money 56

What makes Poco M5 (India) better?


  • Overall rating 41/100

What makes Samsung Galaxy A15 better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 201g

  • Better camera (31/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (68/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 49/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco M5 (India) vs the Samsung Galaxy A15, the Samsung Galaxy A15 scores 7 points higher (48/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 leads (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Poco M5 (India) are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 notably outperforms the Poco M5 (India) (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 is a bit better (60/100 vs 49/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Poco M5 (India) Samsung Galaxy A15
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu 554590 554590
Geekbench Single 727 727
Geekbench Multi 2047 2047
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.5" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 —
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 13 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 12, MIUI 13 —
Brightness (peak) 400 nits —
NFC yes —
Dimensions 164.0×76.1×8.9 mm —
Weight 201 g 200 g
Launch price — $200

Camera comparison

Poco M5 (India)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Samsung Galaxy A15

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera

Display comparison

Poco M5 (India)

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
54
display

Samsung Galaxy A15

  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
68
display

Battery and charging

Poco M5 (India)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Samsung Galaxy A15

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco M5 (India) and Samsung Galaxy A15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco M5 (India) MediaTek Helio G99
41/100
554590 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A15 MediaTek Helio G99
48/100
554590 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco M5 (India)

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy A15

$200

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Poco M5 (India) are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 notably outperforms the Poco M5 (India) (66/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 is a bit better (60/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco M5 (India) or the Samsung Galaxy A15?

The Samsung Galaxy A15 edges out the Poco M5 (India) by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Poco M5 (India) and the Samsung Galaxy A15?

The Poco M5 (India) has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Samsung Galaxy A15 — 48/100.

Should you choose the Poco M5 (India) over the Samsung Galaxy A15?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Samsung Galaxy A15 (66/100 vs 43/100).