Poco F7 vs Vivo S50
The Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo S50 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; launch prices were $399 and $390. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S50 leads — 72/100 vs 66/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,205,289 vs 1,801,694); the Vivo S50 is noticeably lighter (196g vs 215g).
Poco F7
Vivo S50
- Higher AnTuTu: 2205289 vs 1801694
- Better Geekbench Single: 2070 vs 1930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6694 vs 4817
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 75/100)
- Lighter: 196g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $390 vs $399
- Better camera (64/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Poco F7 vs the Vivo S50, the Vivo S50 scores 6 points higher (72/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 leads (64/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Poco F7 — 70/100, Vivo S50 — 82/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (81/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 notably outperforms the Poco F7 (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100. In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 notably outperforms the Poco F7 (66/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Poco F7 | Vivo S50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2205289 | 1801694 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2070 | 1930 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6694 | 4817 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 1260x2750 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | 157.5×74.3×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $390 |
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo S50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S50
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S50
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco F7 and Vivo S50, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 leads Vivo S50 by 22.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $9. Vivo S50 was $9 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (81/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 notably outperforms the Poco F7 (64/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 notably outperforms the Poco F7 (66/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Poco F7 or the Vivo S50?
The Vivo S50 edges out the Poco F7 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F7 and the Vivo S50?
The Poco F7 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo S50 — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 or the Vivo S50?
The Vivo S50 leads on camera score (64/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 or the Vivo S50?
The Poco F7 leads on performance (81/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 over the Vivo S50?
The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo S50 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.