Poco C85 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

The Poco C85 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $100 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 36/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C85 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 348,562); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C85 doesn't; the Poco C85 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 218g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 by 44 points (80/100 vs 36/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco C85

Performance 29
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 49
Portability 62
Value for money 60

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Performance 92
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 70

What makes Poco C85 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 195g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $1299

  • Better portability (62/100 vs 46/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 348562
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 419
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 1461
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 43/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C85 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 44 points higher (80/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Poco C85 — 60/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (92/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (88/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (81/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C85 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (62/100 vs 46/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco C85 Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 348562 3128552
Geekbench Single 419 3100
Geekbench Multi 1461 9760
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1600 3120x1440
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 151
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 12 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 810 nits 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 173.2×81.1×8.0 mm 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm
Weight 195 g 218 g
Launch price $100 $1299

Camera comparison

Poco C85

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Poco C85

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

Poco C85

  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
49
battery

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco C85 and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C85 MediaTek Helio G85
36/100
348562 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
80/100 +88.9%
3128552 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Poco C85 by 88.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco C85

$100

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

$1299

Launch price difference: $1199. Poco C85 was $1199 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (92/100 vs 29/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (88/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 (81/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 49/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco C85 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (62/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco C85 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C85 by 44 points (80/100 vs 36/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C85 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Poco C85 has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 80/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C85 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C85 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 29/100).

Should you choose the Poco C85 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.