Poco F7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

The Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $499 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 79/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,787,981 vs 2,300,523).

The Poco F7 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7 Pro
Performance 88
Display 90
Camera 67
Battery 87
Portability 46
Value for money 86
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Performance 91
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 66
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $1299

  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 88/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2787981 vs 2300523
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 9494
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 218g vs 220g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco F7 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Poco F7 Pro scores 1 points higher (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Poco F7 Pro — 86/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.

Poco F7 Pro: The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco F7 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2300523 2787981
Geekbench Single 3041 3100
Geekbench Multi 9494 9760
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 3200x1440 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 120W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 151
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 32 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 20 MP 12 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm
Weight 220 g 218 g
Launch price $499 $1299
Camera comparison
Poco F7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
67
camera
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera
Display comparison
Poco F7 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Battery and charging
Poco F7 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco F7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
80/100
2300523 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
79/100 +17.5%
2787981 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Poco F7 Pro by 17.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco F7 Pro
$499
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
$1299

Launch price difference: $800. Poco F7 Pro was $800 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (87/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Poco F7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 79/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 67/100).

Should you choose the Poco F7 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.