Poco C65 vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $99 and $320. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 33/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Tecno Camon 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,059,715 vs 348,562).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C65
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $320
- Overall rating 33/100
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1059715 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (59/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (64/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 63/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Tecno Camon 50 Pro, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro scores 32 points higher (65/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (59/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (64/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (58/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco C65 — 56/100, Tecno Camon 50 Pro — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (59/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (64/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C65 (58/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C65 | Tecno Camon 50 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 348562 | 1059715 | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | — | |
| Launch price | $99 | $320 |
Camera comparison
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C65 and Tecno Camon 50 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads Poco C65 by 67.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $221. Poco C65 was $221 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (59/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (92/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (64/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C65 (58/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 32 points (65/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads on performance (59/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Tecno Camon 50 Pro?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (92/100 vs 43/100).