Poco C65 vs Realme Narzo 50 Pro
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. Both devices score the same overall rating of 25/100. Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro doesn't.
Poco C65
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Lighter: 181g vs 192g
- Better camera (29/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 36/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (73/100 vs 60/100)
The Poco C65 and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 25/100. In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a bit better (29/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a bit better (73/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | Realme Narzo 50 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | 262000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.4" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 160.2×73.3×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 181 g | |
| Price | $99 | — |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 6.4" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a bit better (29/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a bit better (73/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
Both devices scored 25/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Realme Narzo 50 Pro.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Realme Narzo 50 Pro leads on camera score (29/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.