Poco X4 NFC vs Realme Narzo 50 Pro
The Poco X4 NFC (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920, while the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco X4 NFC leads — 34/100 vs 25/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Poco X4 NFC has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 48 MP; the Poco X4 NFC has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro doesn't; the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (181g vs 207g).
Poco X4 NFC
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (41/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Lighter: 181g vs 207g
- Better design/ergonomics (73/100 vs 41/100)
Comparing the Poco X4 NFC vs the Realme Narzo 50 Pro, the Poco X4 NFC scores 9 points higher (34/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X4 NFC leads (41/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC leads (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco X4 NFC significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco X4 NFC is a bit better (41/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco X4 NFC (73/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Poco X4 NFC | Realme Narzo 50 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.4" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×76.2×8.3 mm | 160.2×73.3×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 181 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Poco X4 NFC
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco X4 NFC
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 6.4" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco X4 NFC
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco X4 NFC significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco X4 NFC is a bit better (41/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco X4 NFC is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco X4 NFC (73/100 vs 41/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Poco X4 NFC or the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Poco X4 NFC edges out the Realme Narzo 50 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco X4 NFC and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Poco X4 NFC has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco X4 NFC or the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Poco X4 NFC leads on camera score (41/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco X4 NFC over the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Poco X4 NFC is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.