Poco C40 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 31/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco C40 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 226g).
Poco C40
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 204g vs 226g
- Better portability (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Poco C40 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 56 points higher (87/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C40 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Poco C40 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | JLQ | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Poco C40
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (81/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C40 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 56 points (87/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C40 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Poco C40 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.