OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350; launch prices were $661 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 73/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 1,724,757).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 4313
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 70W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 56/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 193g vs 205g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $661
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Tecno Camon 40 Premier, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 14 points higher (87/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 56/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (66/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 1724757 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 1398 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 4313 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 193 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $450 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Tecno Camon 40 Premier, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 75.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $211. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $211 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (90/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (83/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (66/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.