Oppo Reno16 F vs Vivo V40e
The Oppo Reno16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo V40e (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno16 F leads — 63/100 vs 57/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5500); the Oppo Reno16 F has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo V40e doesn't.
Oppo Reno16 F
Vivo V40e
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5500 mAh
- Better camera (64/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
- Lighter: 183g vs 195g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno16 F vs the Vivo V40e, the Oppo Reno16 F scores 6 points higher (63/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 F leads (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno16 F and the Vivo V40e are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 F notably outperforms the Vivo V40e (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 F is a bit better (68/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40e notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F (74/100 vs 57/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno16 F | Vivo V40e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | 163.7×75.0×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno16 F
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo V40e
- Main: 50MP f/f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Oppo Reno16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V40e
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo V40e
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno16 F and Vivo V40e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno16 F and the Vivo V40e are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 F notably outperforms the Vivo V40e (64/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 F is a bit better (68/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40e notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 F (74/100 vs 57/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno16 F or the Vivo V40e?
The Oppo Reno16 F edges out the Vivo V40e by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno16 F and the Vivo V40e?
The Oppo Reno16 F has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo V40e — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno16 F or the Vivo V40e?
The Oppo Reno16 F leads on camera score (64/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno16 F over the Vivo V40e?
The Oppo Reno16 F is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo V40e is a better fit for everyday use.