OPPO Reno16 (China) vs Vivo X300s
The OPPO Reno16 (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $515 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 79/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 6700); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 2,120,347); the OPPO Reno16 (China) is noticeably lighter (188g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 (China)
Vivo X300s
What makes OPPO Reno16 (China) better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $515 vs $723
- Better portability (64/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 2120347
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6405
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 6700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 77/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 (China) vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 10 points higher (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 (China) — 78/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (95/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (64/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 (China) | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2120347 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1216 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $515 | $723 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 (China)
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2640x1216
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 (China)
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 (China) and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads OPPO Reno16 (China) by 42.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $208. OPPO Reno16 (China) was $208 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (95/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (83/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (64/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 (China) or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the OPPO Reno16 (China) — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 (China) and the Vivo X300s?
The OPPO Reno16 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 (China) or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 (China) over the Vivo X300s?
The OPPO Reno16 (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.