Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs Redmi K60 Ultra
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, while the Redmi K60 Ultra (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) leads — 69/100 vs 64/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (183g vs 204g).
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Redmi K60 Ultra
- Lighter: 183g vs 204g
- Better camera (64/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (93/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs the Redmi K60 Ultra, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) scores 5 points higher (69/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) leads (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 74/100. In the "display" category, the Redmi K60 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Ultra (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Ultra (73/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) | Redmi K60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | |
| AnTuTu | 1811490 | 1811490 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1917 | 1917 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4509 | 4509 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1220x2712 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 13, MIUI 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.6 mm | 162.2×75.7×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 183 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi K60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K60 Ultra
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1220x2712
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K60 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) and Redmi K60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 74/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi K60 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Ultra (64/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K60 Ultra (73/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Redmi K60 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) edges out the Redmi K60 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) and the Redmi K60 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Redmi K60 Ultra — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Redmi K60 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) leads on camera score (64/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) over the Redmi K60 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users. The Redmi K60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.