Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs Redmi K90 Max

The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, while the Redmi K90 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Max leads — 67/100 vs 51/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Max has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi K90 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,803,420 vs 1,811,490); the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (183g vs 227g).

The Redmi K90 Max is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Performance 27
Display 100
Camera 62
Battery 51
Design 71
Value for money 55
Redmi K90 Max
Performance 82
Display 100
Camera 32
Battery 77
Design 16
Value for money 75
What makes Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) better?
  • Lighter: 183g vs 227g

  • Better camera (62/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (71/100 vs 16/100)
What makes Redmi K90 Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3803420 vs 1811490
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1917
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4509
  • Bigger battery: 8550 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (82/100 vs 27/100)
  • Longer battery life (77/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better value for money (75/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs the Redmi K90 Max, the Redmi K90 Max scores 16 points higher (67/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (82/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) leads (62/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 Max leads (75/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (82/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (62/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (77/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (71/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (75/100 vs 55/100).

Oppo Reno12 Pro (China): The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Redmi K90 Max: The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) Redmi K90 Max
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1811490 3803420
Geekbench Single 1917 3228
Geekbench Multi 4509 9553
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2412 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 8550 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP66
Dimensions 161.4×74.8×7.6 mm 162.9×77.9×8.1 mm
Weight 183 g 227 g
Price $504
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
62
camera
Redmi K90 Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
32
camera
Display comparison
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2412
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Redmi K90 Max
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery
Redmi K90 Max
  • 8550 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
77
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) and Redmi K90 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
51/100
1811490 AnTuTu
Redmi K90 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500
67/100 +52.4%
3803420 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Max leads Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) by 52.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Price unknown
Redmi K90 Max
$504
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Max significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (82/100 vs 27/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (62/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (77/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Max (71/100 vs 16/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 Max notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (75/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Redmi K90 Max?

The Redmi K90 Max is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) and the Redmi K90 Max?

The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Redmi K90 Max — 67/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Redmi K90 Max?

The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) leads on camera score (62/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Redmi K90 Max?

The Redmi K90 Max leads on performance (82/100 vs 27/100).

Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) over the Redmi K90 Max?

The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K90 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.