Oppo Reno Ace vs Redmi K20 Pro Premium
The Oppo Reno Ace (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Redmi K20 Pro Premium (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno Ace leads — 24/100 vs 17/100 (a 7-point difference).
Oppo Reno Ace
Redmi K20 Pro Premium
- Faster charging: 65W vs 27W
- Longer battery life (23/100 vs 13/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 191g vs 200g
- Better camera (36/100 vs 34/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno Ace vs the Redmi K20 Pro Premium, the Oppo Reno Ace scores 7 points higher (24/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno Ace leads (23/100 vs 13/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 2/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno Ace significantly outperforms the Redmi K20 Pro Premium (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K20 Pro Premium and the Oppo Reno Ace are nearly equal (36/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno Ace is a bit better (23/100 vs 13/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi K20 Pro Premium is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo Reno Ace | Redmi K20 Pro Premium | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | |
| AnTuTu | 859084 | 859084 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1031 | 1031 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2864 | 2864 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.4" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 27W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10.0; ColorOS 6.1 | Android 10; MIUI 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.7×8.7 mm | 156.7×74.3×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 191 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Oppo Reno Ace
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K20 Pro Premium
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo Reno Ace
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Redmi K20 Pro Premium
- 6.4" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo Reno Ace
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K20 Pro Premium
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno Ace and Redmi K20 Pro Premium, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 2/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno Ace significantly outperforms the Redmi K20 Pro Premium (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K20 Pro Premium and the Oppo Reno Ace are nearly equal (36/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno Ace is a bit better (23/100 vs 13/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi K20 Pro Premium is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Redmi K20 Pro Premium?
The Oppo Reno Ace edges out the Redmi K20 Pro Premium by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno Ace and the Redmi K20 Pro Premium?
The Oppo Reno Ace has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Redmi K20 Pro Premium — 17/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno Ace over the Redmi K20 Pro Premium?
The Oppo Reno Ace is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K20 Pro Premium is a better fit for everyday use.