Oppo Reno Ace vs Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
Comparing the Oppo Reno Ace (2019) and the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno Ace leads — 24/100 vs 5/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno Ace has NFC for contactless payments, the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra doesn't.
Oppo Reno Ace
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (34/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (23/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Overall rating 5/100
Comparing the Oppo Reno Ace vs the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra, the Oppo Reno Ace scores 19 points higher (24/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno Ace leads (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno Ace leads (23/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno Ace and the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno Ace significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno Ace significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (34/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno Ace notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (23/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo Reno Ace | Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | — | |
| AnTuTu | 859084 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1031 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2864 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 1.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 466x466 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 65W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | — | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | — | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | — | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10.0; ColorOS 6.1 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.7×8.7 mm | — | |
| Weight | 200 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Oppo Reno Ace
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
- Main: —
- Front: —
Oppo Reno Ace
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
- 1.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 466x466
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo Reno Ace
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno Ace and the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno Ace significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno Ace significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (34/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno Ace notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra (23/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno Ace is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno Ace and the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno Ace has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra — 5/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno Ace leads on camera score (34/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno Ace over the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno Ace is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.