OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Poco C65
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85; launch prices were $661 and $99. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 33/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 346,495).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Poco C65
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 43/100)
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $661
- Better portability (63/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Poco C65, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 53 points higher (86/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 43/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Poco C65 — 50/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (89/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $99 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Poco C65 by 788.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $562. Poco C65 was $562 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (89/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (84/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (94/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (83/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 53 points (86/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Poco C65?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use.