OPPO Reno 16 F vs Vivo X Fold6
The OPPO Reno 16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $480 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 63/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6900); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 877,641); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.4mm).
OPPO Reno 16 F
Vivo X Fold6
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6900 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $480 vs $1900
- Overall rating 63/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2813
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 F vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 25 points higher (88/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 F — 54/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the OPPO Reno 16 F are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (82/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (100/100 vs 58/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 F | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 3485039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | — | |
| Launch price | $480 | $1900 |
OPPO Reno 16 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
OPPO Reno 16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 F and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads OPPO Reno 16 F by 74.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1420. OPPO Reno 16 F was $1420 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (94/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the OPPO Reno 16 F are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (87/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (82/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (100/100 vs 58/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 F or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F by 25 points (88/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 F and the Vivo X Fold6?
The OPPO Reno 16 F has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 F or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 F or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 F over the Vivo X Fold6?
The OPPO Reno 16 F is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.