OPPO Reno 16 F vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The OPPO Reno 16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $480 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 63/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 877,641); the OPPO Reno 16 F is noticeably lighter (194g vs 227g).
OPPO Reno 16 F
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Lighter: 194g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $480 vs $799
- Better portability (58/100 vs 35/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 F vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 26 points higher (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 F — 54/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 F notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (58/100 vs 35/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 F | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $480 | $799 |
OPPO Reno 16 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 F and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 16 F by 80.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $319. OPPO Reno 16 F was $319 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (99/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (92/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 F notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (58/100 vs 35/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 F or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F by 26 points (89/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 F and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 F has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 F or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 F or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 F over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 F is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.