Oppo K10 5G (China) vs ZTE Blade V50
Comparing the Oppo K10 5G (China) (2022) and the ZTE Blade V50 (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo K10 5G (China) leads — 34/100 vs 32/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo K10 5G (China) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Blade V50 is noticeably lighter (178g vs 205g).
Oppo K10 5G (China)
ZTE Blade V50
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (40/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 35/100)
- Lighter: 178g vs 205g
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Oppo K10 5G (China) vs the ZTE Blade V50, the Oppo K10 5G (China) scores 2 points higher (34/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) leads (40/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) leads (48/100 vs 35/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is a bit better (40/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (77/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Oppo K10 5G (China) | ZTE Blade V50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Max | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×75.8×8.7 mm | 161.9×72.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 178 g | |
| Price | — | $351 |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade V50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade V50
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V50
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Oppo K10 5G (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is a bit better (40/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (77/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Oppo K10 5G (China) or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Oppo K10 5G (China) edges out the ZTE Blade V50 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo K10 5G (China) and the ZTE Blade V50?
The Oppo K10 5G (China) has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the ZTE Blade V50 — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo K10 5G (China) or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Oppo K10 5G (China) leads on camera score (40/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Oppo K10 5G (China) over the ZTE Blade V50?
The Oppo K10 5G (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade V50 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.