OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A52

The OPPO Find X9 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Samsung Galaxy A52 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G; launch prices were $1199 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 46/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9 Pro has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the OPPO Find X9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,508,681 vs 517,460); the Samsung Galaxy A52 is noticeably lighter (189g vs 217g).

The OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 by 41 points (87/100 vs 46/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Find X9 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 93
Battery 83
Portability 46
Value for money 84

Samsung Galaxy A52

Performance 41
Display 68
Camera 45
Battery 39
Portability 61
Value for money 20

What makes OPPO Find X9 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3508681 vs 517460
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10800 vs 1762
  • Bigger battery: 6200 vs 4500 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 45/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 68/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A52 better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 189g vs 217g
  • Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $1199

  • Better portability (61/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A52, the OPPO Find X9 Pro scores 41 points higher (87/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (94/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (93/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (83/100 vs 39/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9 Pro — 84/100, Samsung Galaxy A52 — 20/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (94/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (84/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (93/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (83/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9 Pro (61/100 vs 46/100).

OPPO Find X9 Pro: The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Find X9 Pro Samsung Galaxy A52
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
AnTuTu 3508681 517460
Geekbench Single 2900 746
Geekbench Multi 10800 1762
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.5" AMOLED
Resolution 2780x1264 —
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 6200 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 100W —
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 166 —
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 / ColorOS 15.2 —
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 800 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP67
Dimensions 161.3×76.5×8.3 mm 159.9×75.1×8.4 mm
Weight 217 g 189 g
Launch price $1199 $400

Camera comparison

OPPO Find X9 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Samsung Galaxy A52

  • Main: 64MP
  • Front: 32MP
45
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Find X9 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Samsung Galaxy A52

  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
68
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Find X9 Pro

  • 6200 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 19:04 hrs, total 35:19 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Samsung Galaxy A52

  • 4500 mAh
  • No wireless charging
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
87/100
3508681 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
46/100 -578.1%
517460 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X9 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A52 by 578.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Find X9 Pro

$1199

Samsung Galaxy A52

$400

Launch price difference: $799. Samsung Galaxy A52 was $799 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (94/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (84/100 vs 68/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (93/100 vs 45/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (83/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the OPPO Find X9 Pro (61/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 by 41 points (87/100 vs 46/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy A52 — 46/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on camera score (93/100 vs 45/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.