OPPO Find X8 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A52

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A52 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G; launch prices were $999 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 46/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6100 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the OPPO Find X8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,183,101 vs 517,460); the Samsung Galaxy A52 is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 by 40 points (86/100 vs 46/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 94
Battery 78
Portability 35
Value for money 82

Samsung Galaxy A52

Performance 41
Display 68
Camera 45
Battery 39
Portability 61
Value for money 20

What makes OPPO Find X8 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3183101 vs 517460
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1762
  • Bigger battery: 6100 vs 4500 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 45/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 68/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A52 better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 189g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $999

  • Better portability (61/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X8 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A52, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra scores 40 points higher (86/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 39/100). Value score: OPPO Find X8 Ultra — 82/100, Samsung Galaxy A52 — 20/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (91/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (94/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the OPPO Find X8 Ultra (61/100 vs 35/100).

OPPO Find X8 Ultra: The OPPO Find X8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Find X8 Ultra Samsung Galaxy A52
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
AnTuTu 3183101 517460
Geekbench Single 3013 746
Geekbench Multi 9287 1762
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.5" AMOLED
Resolution 3168x1440 —
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 6100 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 80W —
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 168 —
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 —
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits 800 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP67
Dimensions 163.1×76.8×8.8 mm 159.9×75.1×8.4 mm
Weight 226 g 189 g
Launch price $999 $400

Camera comparison

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
94
camera

Samsung Galaxy A52

  • Main: 64MP
  • Front: 32MP
45
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Samsung Galaxy A52

  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
68
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

  • 6100 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:45 hrs, total 28:25 hrs
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
78
battery

Samsung Galaxy A52

  • 4500 mAh
  • No wireless charging
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X8 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A52, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100
3183101 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
46/100 -515.1%
517460 AnTuTu

OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A52 by 515.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Find X8 Ultra

$999

Samsung Galaxy A52

$400

Launch price difference: $599. Samsung Galaxy A52 was $599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (91/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (89/100 vs 68/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (94/100 vs 45/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (78/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the OPPO Find X8 Ultra (61/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Find X8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 by 40 points (86/100 vs 46/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X8 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy A52 — 46/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads on camera score (94/100 vs 45/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X8 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A52?

The OPPO Find X8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.