Oppo A5 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Oppo A5 Pro (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 55/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 877,641); the Oppo A5 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (180g vs 230g).
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 180g vs 230g
- Better portability (76/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo A5 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 36 points higher (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A5 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A5 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo A5 Pro (China) (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Oppo A5 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.9×7.6 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Oppo A5 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Oppo A5 Pro (China) by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A5 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A5 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo A5 Pro (China) (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Oppo A5 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo A5 Pro (China) by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo A5 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Oppo A5 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo A5 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo A5 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A5 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Oppo A5 Pro (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.