Oppo A36 vs Vivo Y32t

The Oppo A36 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A36 leads — 35/100 vs 28/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo A36 is faster in AnTuTu (424,216 vs 303,398).

The Oppo A36 edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Oppo A36

Performance 31
Display 44
Camera 10
Battery 66
Portability 63
Value for money —

Vivo Y32t

Performance 20
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 52
Portability 68
Value for money —

What makes Oppo A36 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 424216 vs 303398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 412 vs 341
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1423 vs 779

  • Higher performance (31/100 vs 20/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (44/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo Y32t better?

  • Lighter: 179g vs 185g

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 63/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo A36 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Oppo A36 scores 7 points higher (35/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo A36 leads (31/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A36 leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo A36 is a bit better (31/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo A36 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Oppo A36 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Oppo A36 Vivo Y32t
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G MediaTek Helio P70 ()
AnTuTu 424216 303398
Geekbench Single 412 341
Geekbench Multi 1423 779
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.5" LCD IPS
Resolution 720x1612 720x1600
Refresh rate 90 Hz —
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging — —
Main camera 13 MP 13 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB —
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 Android 11 Red Velvet Cake
Brightness (peak) 600 nits —
NFC no no
Dimensions 164.4×75.7×8.4 mm 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm
Weight 185 g 179 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Oppo A36

  • Main: 13MP f/2.2
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Vivo Y32t

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Oppo A36

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display

Vivo Y32t

  • 6.5" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Battery and charging

Oppo A36

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery

Vivo Y32t

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Oppo A36 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo A36 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
35/100
424216 AnTuTu
Vivo Y32t MediaTek Helio P70 ()
28/100 -39.8%
303398 AnTuTu

Oppo A36 leads Vivo Y32t by 39.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Oppo A36 is a bit better (31/100 vs 20/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Oppo A36 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Oppo A36 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Oppo A36 or the Vivo Y32t?

The Oppo A36 edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Oppo A36 and the Vivo Y32t?

The Oppo A36 has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.

Which is more powerful: the Oppo A36 or the Vivo Y32t?

The Oppo A36 leads on performance (31/100 vs 20/100).

Should you choose the Oppo A36 over the Vivo Y32t?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Oppo A36 (66/100 vs 52/100).