Oppo A16e vs Vivo Y32t
The Oppo A16e (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 22/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4230); the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 177,554).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo A16e
Vivo Y32t
What makes Oppo A16e better?
- Lighter: 175g vs 179g
- Better portability (75/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 779 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4230 mAh
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo A16e vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 6 points higher (28/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo A16e is a bit better (75/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo A16e | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P22 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 177554 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 233 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 723 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 4230 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.4×7.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo A16e
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Oppo A16e
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Oppo A16e
- 4230 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo A16e and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Oppo A16e by 41.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (20/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo A16e is a bit better (75/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo A16e or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Oppo A16e by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo A16e and the Vivo Y32t?
The Oppo A16e has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo A16e or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t leads on performance (20/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A16e over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y32t (52/100 vs 39/100).